Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 101 - 120 of 8,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2024, 4:25 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The minimum wage applicable to California food restaurants increases to $20 per hour on April 1, 2024. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:27 pm by Keith Bruno
The People will be requesting that the defendant be held on $1 million bail at his arraignment scheduled for today, Thursday, May 20, 2010, in Department CJ-1, Central Jail, Santa Ana. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:26 am by Miller & Falkner
The jury in this case decided that only 20 percent of the negligence by Heartland of Charleston was medical, so only $1 million of the entire award was subject to the cap. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
April 20, 2011) (unpublished).* Applying the rule that courts should decide cases on the narrowest grounds possible, the stop here was justified by the load on defendant’s trailer being too wide, so the validity of the administrative inspection does not have to be decided. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
Defendant’s continued stop was based on reasonable suspicion, and a wait of up to 20 minutes for a drug dog to arrive was not unreasonable. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:39 pm
Defendant can appeal his probation search condition even though he has not yet been subjected to a search. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 7:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States: neff-cert-petition.pdf us-waiver-letter.pdf Questions presented: 1. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:56 am
Further, the record before us does not contain anything that calls into question the validity of the bench warrant. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 7:30 am
February 20, 2008).* Officer's testimony that he saw defendant illegally pass a school bus was evidence enough to justify the stop. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:20 pm
Former TSA employee was interrogated about theft of $20 found in a bin of discarded lighters, a $20 bill he alerted somebody to when he saw it. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:05 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
To prevail on a negligence cause of action, a plaintiff must prove (1) the existence of a legal duty, (2) breach of the duty, and (3) injury proximately caused by the defendant’s breach. [read post]