Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I"
Results 101 - 120
of 12,241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
The Chief Justice does not look kindly at what Counselor to the Special Counsel, Michael R. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The court held that (i) the summary of the merger agreement in the proxy statement is not sufficient to satisfy such requirement because the “Proxy Statement is not the notice” and (ii) the copy of the merger agreement attached as an annex to the Proxy Statement was insufficient, because, at a minimum, it omitted an essential document appended thereto, i.e., the surviving corporation’s certificate of incorporation. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
II. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am
Well, if well-established principles of EU design law were applied correctly, and in the correct order, this inevitably would lead (and eventually lead) to the only rightful outcome in the case at hand – lack of validity of the contested RCD.Accordingly, there are a total of five steps to be taken when assessing the validity (more specifically: individual character) of a design, namely (i) determining the subject matter of the contested RCD, preferably by identifying its… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
§ 1.263(a)-4(b)(1)(v) [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
I. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Until recently, I would have said no to both questions. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
CSIS does not take policy positions, so theviews represented in this testimony are my own and not those of my employer.In my testimony, I would like to give you my assessment of China’s ambitions in the MiddleEast, and the Middle East’s ambitions with China. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:38 pm
If one does not break into or out of a place, they would fail to meet this element of the offence. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
For more information on SEC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:29 am
The CJEU then went on to reiterate its conclusions in the Austria Post case (see our blog here on that case) as to the conditions that must be satisfied for non-material damages to be awarded, namely: (i) the individual suffered damage; (ii) there was an infringement of the GDPR; and (iii) there is a causal link between the damage and the infringement. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
’” The Court emphasized its prior decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:00 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
In Futch v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
In Futch v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Labrador v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
II. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:56 am
Mekhail v. [read post]
