Search for: "Doe Insurance Company I and II" Results 101 - 120 of 1,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2019, 1:48 pm by IncNow
For more protection against personal injury liability, insurance can be obtained by the Loan Out Company. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, if a SPAC does identify a target that it believes would make for a lucrative investment and the target is amenable to being acquired on the terms proposed by the SPAC, the SPAC and the target will merge to produce a single public company, with the SPAC investors’ shares being converted into shares of the post-acquisition company. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:13 am by CodeX
This approach has been deployed at scale by some insurance companies to automate the FNOL process and perform coverage checks. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:36 am
  Surplus lines insurers wishing to assume policies must, in addition to certain filing requirements, meet the following:  (i) be eligible to write surplus lines insurance in Florida; (ii) maintain a surplus of $50 million on a company or pooled basis; (iii) maintain an A.M. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
This subparagraph does not apply to claims under flood policies issued under the national flood insurance program. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
I do not expect insurers for trucking companies to voluntarily open the records or the checkbook on such claims. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 7:20 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Paragraph 13 of 'Conditions' of the policy provided:'SUBROGATION Parts I, II, and III In the event of any payment under this policy, the company shall be subrogated to all the insured's rights of recovery therefor against any person or organization and the insured shall execute and deliver instruments and papers and do whatever else is necessary to secure such rights. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I believe, both, the stock market and the insurance market, are driven by emotions. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
This subparagraph does not apply to claims under flood policies issued under the national flood insurance program. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:57 am by Chip Merlin
During that initial appraisal, the Insureds believed the appraisal award was acceptable based on (i) their reading of the appraisal award and (ii) their independent appraiser’s confirmation with the umpire as to the meaning of the appraisal award. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Concerning retiree-only coverage, the Preamble states: Although group health plans that have fewer than two participants who are current employees (such as retiree-only plans) are excluded from the requirements of Code chapter 100 (setting forth requirements applicable to group health plans such as portability, nondiscrimination, and market reform requirements), this exclusion does not apply to Code §§ 4375 and 4376 because these sections are in chapter 34; and For… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:02 am by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appeal arises out of the discovery by the appellant in 2016 that subsequent to Mr Rokison’s appointment and without the appellant’s knowledge, Mr Rokison had accepted appointment as an arbitrator in two other references both of which arose out of the same Deepwater Horizon incident (i) Transocean’s claim against the respondent; and (ii) a nomination by another insurer to arbitrate another claim by Transocean arising out of the same incident. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:26 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Wrynn said: “In my career I’ve had the opportunity to develop great relationships with a number of the partners at Goldberg Segalla, and I felt this firm would be the perfect fit for my return to private practice because of its high regard in the insurance industry and its refreshing service ethic that truly does put clients first. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:13 pm
Plaintiffs seek what the policy simply does not cover—an alleged theft by a member of a named insured. [read post]