Search for: "Doe v. Holder et al" Results 101 - 120 of 522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 4:49 am by Jim Singer
In Continental Automotive GmbH et al v. iBiquity Digital Corporation, the plaintiff held a license from the patent holder. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm by Howard Knopf
Moreover, there are no judicial precedents establishing liability on the part of an internet services account holder for someone else’s activity using that account, even if such activity may have infringed copyright. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 10:30 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The University of Chicago no longer is in danger of losing ancient Iranian artifacts following Wednesday's United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:42 am by Richard Hunt
A new decision from the United States District Court in Illinois, Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:23 am by Jonathan Bailey
This essentially means that all copyright holders, regardless of where they are located, need to register their works with the USCO before filing suit in the country if they wish to seek statutory damages.Needless to say, considering that most nations have no formalities at all for copyright protection, this decision is going to cause some major headache for foreign copyright holders as they try to enforce their rights within the U.S.What HappenedThe case in question is Elsevier… [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
BOM, et al., Index Number 22937/2009, a residential foreclosure proceeding. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
§  Petitioners’ reply §  Amicus brief of Economists et al. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Ass’n of Retired Employees of the City of Stockton, et al. v. [read post]