Search for: "Doe v. Parson" Results 101 - 120 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Jason M. Halper
In a bench ruling in the case, City of Miami General Employees’ & Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 5:08 am
Okla. 2013), and the Tenth Circuit affirmed that decision, see Parson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by chief
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Parsons Brown & Co. (1989), 39 B.C.L.R. (2d) 107 (C.A.). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 4:27 am by Stephen Pitel
In Parsons v The Canadian Red Cross Society, 2013 ONSC 3053 (available here), Winkler CJ (of the Court of Appeal, here sitting down in the Superior Court of Justice) has held that a judge of the SCJ can sit as such outside Ontario. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
 The subject of Norman's guest post here is the recent US decision in CLS Bank Int’l v Alice Corp 2011-1301 (Fed Cir 2013) en banc aff’g 768 F Supp 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2011). [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 11:12 am by Morse, Barnes-Brown Pendleton
By: Joe Marrow In a Delaware Court of Chancery decision dated February 22, 2013, Vice Chancellor Parsons held that a reverse triangular merger does not constitute an assignment by operation of law under Delaware law. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:52 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: RAYMOND ALEXANDER VERHEYDT v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm by Kevin F. Brady
Although NOERS may have chosen rationally, from its perspective, the lesser of two evils, the marginal market premium NOERS obtained does not necessarily reflect acquiescence in the approximately $8 Merger price or negate or resolve the concerns of inevitability that animate the controlling shareholder cases…. [read post]