Search for: "Doe v. State Ethics Commission" Results 101 - 120 of 726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
Anderson now switches to the ethics of the future use of force in counter-terrorism operations. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Michael Froomkin
” What voters should look for is “someone who does their homework, has a moral and ethical standard. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
… in AM & S Europe v Commission, … 41. the Court stated that the protection [of legal privilege] was subject to two cumulative conditions. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
From the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications, Indiana Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinion # 1-20, just posted on Westlaw; recall that Indiana judges, like the judges in most states, run in elections: In light of recent events, a number of judicial officers have sought advice about whether, consistent with their ethical obligations under the Code of Judicial Conduct, they may attend and participate in marches, demonstrations, vigils, protests, and other… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am by Vanessa Sauter
David Houck provided an update on United States v. al-Nashiri, where an ethics expert testified on the defense team’s withdrawal. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:07 am by Bill Raftery
Building Public Confidence in Commissions: Enhancements In addition to opening interviews to the public, we recommend that the state and district nominating commissions: adopt uniform rules of procedure, adopt a code of ethics, and adopt procedures for the release of more information to the public. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:56 am by Rick Hasen
  The Court also distinguished the First Amendment right to sign a petition recognized in Doe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
 Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
New York State Ethics Commission, No. 162 Imposition of a civil penalty under Public Officers Law section 73(18) does not require the New York State Ethics Commission to prove that petitioner knew the conduct was prohibited and acted intentionally to violate the statute. [read post]