Search for: "Does 1 - 175" Results 101 - 120 of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2024, 2:52 pm by Katherine Gallo
§2016.090(b))  It also does not apply to cases where a party is not represented by counsel. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With letter of 20 April 2017, the appellant filed a modified version of the first to third auxiliary requests.First auxiliary requestClaim 1 of the first auxiliary request differed from claim 1 as granted in that "which polyolefin composition comprises" was replaced by "which polyolefin composition consists of" and the disclaimer "wherein the composition does not contain beta-nucleating agent" was removed.Second auxiliary requestClaim… [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm by Jon
It does not expressly give it the power to regulate immigration, which is the process of legally entering the country. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:09 pm by Walter Olson
Not bad to save a finger, but the thing does have a significant false alarm rate. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm by Derek T. Muller
Mary's University 68.9% 7.3 144 18 2 61.6% 113 19 1 2.2 Texas A&M University 68.3% 0.5 121 19 0 67.8% 137 17 0 1.6 South Texas College of Law Houston 62.2% 8.0 175 31 0 54.2% 164 25 1 1.5 Texas Southern University 58.9% 16.0 79 10 0 42.9% 52 11 0 [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 2:43 am by Alexa von Uexküll
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court in 4A_576/2017 already made it clear that this change of practice does not have retroactive effect, so that the “infringement test” remains applicable to earlier granted SPCs. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
City of Los Angeles, 175 Cal.App.4th 1396 (“Palmer”), that rendered many inclusionary housing requirements unenforceable under California law. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Summerfield
  This is mildly positive news, following as it does a fall of 5.2% between 2017 and 2018. [read post]
14 May 2015, 5:46 pm by Jim Gerl
Doe 484 U.S.305, 108 S.Ct. 594, 597, 559 IDELR 231 (1988). [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:17 am by Matt Johnston
Does it matter how you define it when the number is around 15 percent? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
R 13(3) EPC 1973 and A 175(3) EPC 1973). [read post]