Search for: "Does 1 through 120, inclusive"
Results 101 - 120
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 8:26 pm
CMS announced today:"...Upcoming Updates to the Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Portal (MSPRP) Modification for Inclusion of Final Conditional Payment (CP) Process Functionality""As part of the Strengthening Medicare and Repaying Taxpayers Act of 2012 (the SMART Act), the MSPRP will be modified to include Final CP process functionality by January 1, 2016. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
What does “pretend” mean, especially as it is absent from subsection (b)? [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:34 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:20 am
I wonder what in-line linking does to all of this. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
This reconfirmation can also be obtained through negative consent. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
Rev. 63 (2004)14140Carrier, Michael A.Cabining Intellectual Property through a Property Paradigm [article] 54 Duke L.J. 1 (2004)15138Allison, John R.; Lemley, Mark A.; Moore, Kimberly A.; Trunkey, R. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:13 pm
What Does ESTA Require? [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
1. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
To indicate participation in Protocol 1.0 and Protocol 2.0, market participants must respond to each Protocol’s questionnaire, submit an adherence letter and pay an adherence fee of $500.00 per Protocol through the online ISDA Amend system. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
”9 Thus, we can break theft of movable property under the Model Penal Code into three elements: (1) unlawful taking or control, (2) of movable property of another, and (3) with intent to deprive. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
This very long – 123 pages – decision contains lots of interesting procedural aspects (it’s one of those decisions where the appellants are desperate enough to invoke Article 6 of the Human Rights Convention, which is never a good sign) and is well worth skimming through. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
Alternatively, a bulkhead may cover 20 percent of the lot coverage of a building, limited to a height of 25 feet where the building height limit is 120 feet or 40 feet where the building height limit exceeds 120. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
Let us consider each of these three contentions in turn, for each has a complicated story behind it–a story that does not favor the plurality’s conclusion. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 11:23 am
This reconfirmation can also be obtained through a negative consent. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Instead, the court ruled that the $36 million award, at trial, was entirely explained by the improper inclusion of a particular group of mostly vacant lots in the Port Colborne property value calculation. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 2:27 pm
No replies yet — but I’ll let you know. 1. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:16 pm
§ 41-10-120 (LexisNexis 2007) and Wyo. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
__________________________________________________Footnotes:1. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am
Traditionally, companies have sought the Commission staff’s views on decisions to exclude shareholder proposals made pursuant to Rule 14a-8 through the no-action letter process. [9] Interestingly, the shareholder proposal rule also only requires a company to notify the Commission staff of its intention to exclude the proposal and provide its reasons for such exclusion. [read post]
