Search for: "Does 1-152" Results 101 - 120 of 868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2008, 10:08 pm
  While the United States per capita number justifies action, so does the potential for China to grow its emissions. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 2:18 am
(a) IN GENERAL- Subparagraph (A) of section 1(g)(2) (relating to child to whom subsection applies) is amended to read as follows:`(A) such child--`(i) has not attained age 18 before the close of the taxable year, or`(ii)(I) has attained age 18 before the close of the taxable year and meets the age requirements of section 152(c)(3) (determined without regard to subparagraph (B) thereof), and`(II) whose earned income (as defined in section 911(d)(2)) for such taxable year… [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Pursuant to G.L. c. 152 § 1(1), average weekly wages are the earnings of the employee during the 12 months preceding the date of injury, divided by 52. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 7:16 am by Kevin Kaufman
Senate Bill 152, which addresses the issue, recently passed and has been referred to the Ways and Means Committee. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:02 pm by John P. Ahlers
RCW 64.50.02(1) adds an additional step for commencing a suit under CR 3(a).The notice requirement of RCW 64.50.0200 (1) like the notice requirement of RCW 7.70.150, "does not address the primary rights of either party and deals only with the procedures to affect those rights". [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:30 pm by Andrew Strachan
The legal question before the Supreme Court of Appeal was formulated as follows “when a company in business rescue (Company A) is a creditor of another company in business rescue (Company B), and Company B is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company A, does the right to cast a vote on any matter contemplated under section 151 and section 152 of the Companies of 2008, vest in Company A’s business rescue practitioners or its board of directors? [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:37 am
  However, Section 152(e) does not preclude the non-custodial parent from claiming the exemption so long a the custodial parent executes IRS Form 8332 releasing the exemption. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by Misty Edmundson
”Second, RSUI contended that even if presumptive damages were appropriate in this case, the amount of the presumed damages cannot exceed the $1 million limit of the  policy with RSUI, absent a finding of bad faith. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 2:15 pm
First, it added a couple of sentences that said: "The appellate record does not contain evidence about the current status of the City’s licensing of storefront cannabis businesses. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm by Terry Briscoe
NLRB, 721 F.3d 152 (4th Cir. 2013).Had the rule gone into effect, the impact on employers who failed to post the notice could have been severe. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Petit, The Enforcement of Patent Rights in France, in: Heath/Petit, Patent Enforcement Worldwide, IIC Studies 23, Hart Publishing 2005, 152/153). [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
 Respondent Phicom’s (old) Type B and Type C accused products infringe claims 1-3, 12, 24, and 25 of U.S. [read post]