Search for: "Does 1-18"
Results 101 - 120
of 22,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
(Doe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Today's essay is part 1 of my discussion of the Idaho case, focusing on the question of Congress's authority to preempt state law via the Spending power. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The proposed law enforcement Codes of Conduct do not have to involve any data protection expertise, nor the ICO, nor does the text require Parliamentary approval nor does a Code have to consider its impact on data subjects. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Human Rights Council, Activities of vulture funds and their impact on human rights, 18 and 20 (A/HRC/41/51, May 7, 2019). [8] U.N. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:03 pm
Some of the significant violations are as follows: 1. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm
(e)1. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
§ 1512(c)(1); and to conspire to deny individuals’ constitutional rights. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
Described that way, it strikes me as within the ambit of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:26 pm
One does not speak here so much about hermeneutics. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:38 am
A connection can be made between the traditional artistic motif of the reclining nude and Mann’s photograph Body Farm #18, an image of a corpse lying prone. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
Pointing to the more relaxed modes of service permitted under the ROC 2021[18] in comparison with the predecessor ROC 2014,[19] the AR stated that there was no suggestion in Order 8 rule 1(3) or in the definitions provided elsewhere which suggested that both method and place of service had to be specified in a jurisdiction clause in order for a claimant to avail itself of service out without permission of the court. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Second, it is true that in 1995, the Office of Legal Counsel suggested in an opinion that the federal bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
All but one are from the Justices.1. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
What does this mean for the use of AI in the Defense Base Act practice area? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
Nor does Plaintiff specify the nature of these potential harms. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:54 am
The people living within one mile of the proposed facility include the following demographics: 26% people of color 18% low-income 11% with less than high school education 1% with limited English speaking ability 0% unemployment $40,100 per capita income 88% homeowners Taken together, this is the profile of a middle-class rural community. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Changes will come into effect on Aug. 1, and importers have 18 months until Jan. 31, 2026, to transition to the modified requirements. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Section 122(18) is not intended to impact certain other principles articulated in existing case law, nor does it affect the case law empowering a court to grant equitable relief in respect of a contract, such as when a contract is set aside because the counterparties have aided and abetted a breach of fiduciary duty or based on director actions under an enhanced form of scrutiny. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Comments on the final proposal were submitted on April 18, 2024. [read post]
