Search for: "Does 1-215"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
Here’s a rundown of the majority opinion, with some additional thoughts of mine at the end. 1. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:36 am
§ 203(e)(1). [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:01 am
Therefore, the lump-sum payment does not meet one of the factors of § 71(b)(1) of the Code that requires no such designation of the payment in the divorce or separation instrument in order to meet the definition of alimony or separate maintenance payment for purposes of §§ 71 and 215. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:00 pm
To be sure, in the event that Section 215 does lapse on June 1, the NSA hypothetically could still seek to collect for up to ninety days, pursuant to authority granted by the FISC before the sunset. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 10:26 am
There are three things to bear in mind as you ponder all that. 1. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:24 am
The appellate court went on to state that it found that Rule 215 does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:58 am
This policy should address the needs of youth who are considered "high-risk" who are defined per Education Code §215(a)(1) as:1) Youth bereaved by suicide. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:12 am
I therefore hereby proclaim the following: Section 1. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
But apparently this decision has come as a surprise in some quarters.The s.215(1) argument remains to be heard. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
But apparently this decision has come as a surprise in some quarters.The s.215(1) argument remains to be heard. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:43 am
In paras. 209-215, the AB criticized the Panel's decision to (1) assume that Article XX applied and then (2) consider whether the measure fell under Article XX(a). [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
The mainstream media seem to have been reading an entirely different CJEU judgment in the Nestlé v Cadbury "Kit Kat" case than the one published in Curia here(Case C-215/4). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:22 pm
(Appellant’s App. at 1-2.) [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Code § 27-1-31-1. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:07 pm
The law amending Prop 215 was an unlawful amendment by the legislature of the CUA. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:02 am
The law amending Prop 215 was an unlawful amendment by the legislature of the CUA. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:35 am
This does not apply until the bill is passed and the provision is in force. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:52 am
”1 What does all this mean? [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
Unlike other types of nursing home abuse, neglect does not always occur on purpose. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 11:52 am
If you’d like to leave a message by phone, contact us at +1 202 862 5785. [read post]
