Search for: "Does 1-82" Results 101 - 120 of 1,892
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The decision discusses alleged conflicting or at least diverging application of G 1/92, as well as G 1/92 itself, in detail. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
DCAA’s audit guidance does not have the force and effect of law.[34] Nevertheless, it provides contractors valuable insight into what to expect from each type of DCAA audit as well as DCAA’s substantive interpretation of the applicable cost and pricing regulations. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[43] But section 14(a) does not specifically preempt state corporate law or even specifically mention shareholder proposals. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:44 pm by Bill Marler
Cases ranged from 30 to 82 years of age (median age of 63). [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am by Matt Tait
It is possible to have a society that does not have fair trials: Ancient societies, and modern dictatorships all exist without them. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:52 am by Patricia Hughes
Unlike some rights or freedoms, such as sections 8, 9 and 11, section 3 does not contain an explicit limitation. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 7:00 pm
"At the sentencing hearing, Susan Mosser, who lost her husband in a Unabomber attack, urged Burrell to “make the sentence bullet-proof, or bomb-proof, lock him so far down that when he does die, he’ll be closer to hell. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Tom Dannenbaum
The Protocol I provision requires states to criminalize the listed acts domestically, including with the present-in form of universal jurisdiction (Article 85(1) AP I, as informed, e.g., by Article 146 Geneva Convention IV), but does not directly underpin the jurisdiction of any supranational court or tribunal. [read post]