Search for: "Dolan v. Land" Results 101 - 120 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 7:54 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
West Linn Corporate Park LLC v City of West Linn, No. 11-299 (petition for cert. filed Sep. 6, 2011), a petition we've been following that asked whether the nexus and "rough proportionality" tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited to government demands for land, has been denied. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
That's the case which asks whether the nexus and "rough proportionality" tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited to government demands for land. [read post]
First, it was the petition for certiorari in West Linn Corporate Park LLC v City of West Linn, No. 11-299 (petition for cert. filed Sep. 6, 2011), which asks whether the nexus and "rough proportionality" tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited to government demands for land. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The Ninth Circuit concluded it does not, disagreeing with the California and Texas Supreme Courts, which have held that Nollan/Dolan is applicable to all exactions, not just demands for land. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:48 pm by Mark Murakami
City of West Linn • Question:  Do the “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” tests from Nollan and Dolan apply to exactions of personal property – in this case, cash – for discretionary land use permits? [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:52 pm by Lawrence Solum
Mary Jean Dolan (The John Marshall Law School) has posted Salazar V. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:56 pm by Lawrence Solum
Mary Jean Dolan (The John Marshall Law School) has posted P.S. [read post]