Search for: "Donnell v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2015, 7:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
This is the majority view in the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm
Flández-Marcel, 2019 WL 6836785 (First Circuit, 2019) the district court denied Alejandro Díaz-Alarcón petition for return of his daughter from the United States to Chile. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Patton v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:04 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
I think the comment of Lord Kerr of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Rugby Football Union, … is apposite. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
There are millions of immigrants arriving in the United States each year, and many of these people choose to come to California. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Kennedy, French, O’Neill, and Fischer No: Justices O’Donnell and DeWine Key Precedent Fourteenth Amendment (“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Linert et al. v Adrien Foutz, et al., 14-1940. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Justice Kennedy wrote the dissent for herself and Justice O’Donnell. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Dohme v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
This hack led to a putative class action complaint being filed against OPM and others in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in late June, 2015.[6] As in the customer cases discussed above, the gravamen of the employee complaint against OPM is inaction. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:04 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
United States, 919 F. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:46 pm
When the commission ruled for Germany, the heirs went to federal court in the United States, arguing that the art had been taken in violation of international law. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
No: Justices O’Donnell and French. [read post]
