Search for: "Doughty v. State"
Results 101 - 115
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81]) As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a… [read post]
Examinations Under Oath – Insurer Requests Have to Be Reasonable and Made Before the Claim Is Denied
24 Aug 2023, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
Doughty in the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
Doughty in the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am
This article from the New York Times ($) summarises the position in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 4:02 pm
Marques v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:46 am
In an early holiday delivery, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) today handed down its judgment in the joined cases of Tele Sverige/Watson & Ors (C-203/15/C-698/15), this morning. [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:09 pm
In 1998, the Canadian Supreme Court in Thomson Newspapers Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm
It is telling that no defendant in any of the recent high profile SLAPP cases sought to strike out the claims under the existing Wallis v Valentine [2002] EWCA Civ 1034 jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am
http://bit.ly/LPLQcg (Bob Ambrogi) Model Behavior: Federal and State Court Rules on eDiscovery - - http://bit.ly/Mk6eHa (Jessica Mederson) Phase 2 of Discovery Pilot Provides Glimpse into Future of eDiscovery – - http://bit.ly/Oxc1V6 (BLLAWG) Robots Are Not Replacing eDiscovery Lawyers - http://bit.ly/MkKifa (Jason Krause) Rules for eDiscovery Vendors in D.C.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney)… [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton) Reducing… [read post]
