Search for: "Downloader 96"
Results 101 - 120
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
See Social Security Ruling 96-7p. 2. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the decision of the Receiving Section (RS) refusing to treat an application as a divisional application.On May 26, 2010, a third party had requested a stay of proceedings concerning the parent application, a few days after the Examining Division had issued a decision to grant.On June 8, 2010, the applicant filed a divisional application.The mention of the grant of the parent application was published in the Bulletin.On June 10, 2010, the Legal Division informed the parties… [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
T 302/93 [2.4 et seq.] and T 1069/96 [2.3.3]).[10] In the present case the notice of opposition consisted of only the four-page form and two additional sheets listing as evidence documents D1 to D26. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Not following T 410/96 does therefore not constitute a substantial procedural violation within the meaning of R 67 and reimbursement of the appeal fee is not justified.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
One has the impression that the Boards have not reached a consensus on this topic yet.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:23 am
†American Economic Review, 96(2), 77-81. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 8:05 am
Cumulation with copyright (Art. 23 Draft Directive, Art. 96(2) Draft Regulation) The principle of cumulation of design and copyright protection is maintained. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm
Download the eminent domain decision here. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 1:07 am
Download or read the article here.See earlier ITC study (1992) by Sheldon Meyer and Mark Miller here.See also John Mutti & Bernand Yeung, Section 337 and the Protection of Intellectual Property in the United States: The Complanaints and the Impact, 78 REV. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 11:04 am
However, Lyle Lovett dropped to 96% from 100% last week. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
Download a copy of the agenda here (pdf) [1] Cuomo 2010, Cleaner Greener NY, at 1 (2010). [2] Id. at 7. [3] Id. at 91-92. [4] Id. at 94. [5] Id. at 96. [6] Id. at 95. [7] Id. at 97-98. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:51 am
Demonstrating the outrage over this issue, the measure passed both house of Maryland's General Assembly with 96% support. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 11:10 am
Of the 27 people interviewed, 26 (96%) reported eating leafy greens. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
You can check out the specific punishments by checking out the NY DMV’s handy pamphlet (downloads as a pdf). [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
., at 195-96. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 11:06 am
Executive Decree 320 of 2008 was published this week and gives the fine print for the Immigration Law enacted in early 2008.Effective August 26, the main changes from current practice would be:- Tourists may remain in the country only for 90 days, with only those with an original period under 90 days being able to ask for an extension to complete the 90 days when justified (Art. 21),- Foreign workers within the 10% maximum must have a salary of US$850 monthly to apply for residency and work permit… [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
I became quite fascinated as I played with the data, downloaded as a CSV file, in my spreadsheet program. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:17 am
According to a study from The George Washington University (ppt–not worth downloading, IMHO), the cost of a dissatisfied customer is staggering: The average business does not hear from 96% of unhappy customers For every complaint received, there are 24 people with unvoiced problems; six are serious 90% who are dissatisfied with the service won’t return The average customer with a complaint will tell 9-10 people; 13% will tell more than 20 people Other studies confirm… [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:13 am
Id., at 730.Download PDF file of Yeager v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
In re Consumer Privacy Cases, ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 96 Cal.Rptr.3d 127, 130 (Cal.App. 2009). [read post]
