Search for: "Downs v. Rosenthal"
Results 101 - 118
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2009, 3:28 am
In this case, it appears that the Appellate Division came down half-way between the two poles. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
Rosenthal, as reported by Vince Manapat, online: http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/216 .]], to “tremendously important commentary”[[Ibid.]], to “a parody”[[Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Defendant’s Response”), online http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2009cv05095/346633/25/, at 16.]], and finally to “a complex and… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:46 am
A5633
Aubry (MS) -- Allows petitions to conditionally seal certain drug convictions No Same asLast Act: 02/17/09 referred to codesA5658
Rosenthal (MS) -- Requires banks operating ATM facilities to equip such facilities with 911 or E-911 emergency access buttons wherever such emergency service is available No Same asLast Act: 02/17/09 referred to banksA5690
Espaillat (MS) -- Provides for the regulation of campaign contributions and… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Copyright A bit about derivative works (Ip's What's Up) Australia Singapore Treaty takes effect March 2009 (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Capital allowances: business related costs – business transfer arrangement establishing right to intellectual property (IP Down Under) Droit de suite scheme introduced into Parliament (International Law Office) Interlocutory relief partially granted in Sebel Furniture Limited… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:26 am
Gillespie County which was decided in her favor this year by the US Supreme Court and is presently transforming how Texas counties handle indigent defense.Lloyd Kelley, a Houston attorney whose civil suit revealed emails to and from then-District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal that ultimately brought down the powerful DA's administration, only to see his former law partner, C.O. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 6:38 pm
The Offside has the story of Hannover 96 v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:33 am
In Goldstein v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
The Act itself is infamous for other reasons (parts of it were struck down in ACLU v Reno, the first Supreme Court decision on Internet free expression), but this element has survived and prospered. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:38 pm
Id.; see Rosenthal v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 1:38 am
"I would hate for one person's actions and lack of judgment to take down the entire office," he said. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:22 pm
This issue is presented, but not considered, in Lopez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
By way of example, in Rosenthal v. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 11:12 pm
Third, in promoting self-regulation, such immunity reconciles two seemingly conflicted goals: the need to limit the availability of objectionable content to minors and preserving the robust exchange of ideas enabled by the internet (see Law Professors' Amicus Brief, Barrett v Rosenthal, November 22, 2004). [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 7:26 pm
Third, in promoting self-regulation, such immunity reconciles two seemingly conflicted goals: the need to limit the availability of objectionable content to minors and preserving the robust exchange of ideas enabled by the internet (see Law Professors' Amicus Brief, Barrett v Rosenthal, November 22, 2004). [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 9:51 am
Recently, in Barrett v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 8:09 pm
Rosenthal In a much anticipated ruling, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision on November 20, 2006 in the case of Barret v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 2:23 pm
Rosenthal, S122953 (Cal. [read post]
