Search for: "Dubay v. Wells" Results 101 - 106 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2007, 6:45 pm
Usually such an affidavit, which if believed would provide the basis for relief, would at least entitle the defense to a DuBay hearing under United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:40 am
The answer here is: not well. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:22 pm
Well, CAAF remanded that other case -- Luke -- to NMCCA on Friday (though, oddly enough, it spelled DuBay "Dubay" in the Luke order, which appears two cases above the daily docket entry for the Eckard order, which spelled DuBay "DuBay. [read post]
20 Jul 2006, 7:40 am
On July 17, 2006, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Dubay v Wells et al., stating: "According to the pleadings, Dubay commenced a personal relationship with defendant Lauren Wells, dated her, engaged in intimate sexual relations, impregnated her, terminated his relationship, and sued her for bearing his child. [read post]
19 Jul 2006, 9:29 am
District Judge David Lawson’s dismissal of the lawsuit filed to declare Matthew Dubay’s child support obligation to Lauren Wells, his ex-girlfriend, unconstitutional (excerpt): But Lawson disagreed and rejected Dubay’s argument that Michigan’s paternity law violates the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2006, 10:23 am by Jeff
The only practical difference in the child’s life between Mr Dubay and a sperm donor is that Mr Dubay is not anonymous. [read post]