Search for: "E.D. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 101 - 120
of 219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
A majority of fed cattle in the United States are sold to packing plants and processed into various beef products. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., 2010 WL 1257931, at *2 (D. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:03 am
United States of America v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:03 am
United States of America v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
AIU North America, No. 0430, Control No. 13110820 (C.P. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
E.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:06 am
Separately, in Oracle America, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Supp.2d 693, 706 (E.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
” The plaintiffs defined their putative class as including “all governmental entities in the United States of America who have been caused to expend monies" for certain drugs as a "result of the off label promotion by the defendants. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:56 am
It’s been a year and 43 blogs since last President’s Day and like Yosemite falls, the broad picture of ADA and FHA litigation in America remains about the same despite the passage of time. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Based on this assumption the Court finds that a single family unit is not properly comparable to the unit make up of unrelated disabled residents of a group home. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
Supp.2d 1048, 1059 (E.D. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
Barrett, 2017 WL 1329434 (E.D. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
The case is currently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm
This is the promise of America. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
LEXIS 145462 (E.D. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
“They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
