Search for: "E.I. du Pont de Nemours " Results 101 - 120 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Jon L. Gelman
Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 118 N.J.L. 404, 193 A. 194 (1937), aff'd 119 N.J.L. 427, 197 A. 276 (Err. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Jon Gelman
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Justice announced today a settlement with E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) at its Belle, W. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:06 pm
., Coudert Brothers Regina Pisa, Goodwin Procter John Quinn, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan Ralph Savarese, Howrey Clinton Stevenson, Latham & Watkins Law Firm Values Hillary Rodham Clinton, ABA Commission on Women in the Profession Esther Lardent, Pro Bono Institute Jonathan Lippman, New York State Chief Judge Robert MacCrate, ABA Task Force on Law Schools and The Profession David Morley, Allen & Overy Roderick Palmore, Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Thomas… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
" Mars, for its part, appealed the verdict, arguing the trial court erred by qualifying Beauregarde as an expert under E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm by D. Todd Smith
Update 7/6/09: On my initial pass through last week's orders, I missed another related case, In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (08-0625), which was decided without oral argument. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:57 am by Tiffany Blofield
In determining whether there was a likelihood of confusion, the Board, as usual, applied the factors identified in the In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
The plaintiff alleged that DuPont (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.), which sells products including Teflon, Stainmaster carpet, and Gore-tex, continuously dumped carcinogenic waste into the Ohio River, and the company tried to conceal the dangers of C-8. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:13 pm by Kalvis Golde
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am by Amy Howe
After considering the case at seven consecutive conferences, the justices finally denied review in E.I. du Pont de Nemours v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm by James Hastings
   In Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases,  the plaintiff must establish the presence of a likelihood of confusion between the parties’ trademarks pursuant to the thirteen factors set forth in the case of In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm by D. Todd Smith
Update 7/6/09: On my initial pass through last week's orders, I missed another related case, In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (08-0625), which was decided without oral argument. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
., E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
Du Pont de Nemours, 364 NLRB 1648 (2016), which held that any “unilateral changes made pursuant to a past practice under an expired management rights clause are unlawful. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Board evaluated whether there was a likelihood of confusion by looking at the thirteen factors identified in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973). [read post]
21 May 2024, 11:45 am by Robert Zulandt
  Relying on and analyzing the “likelihood of confusion” factors set forth in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., the TTAB denied ROGUE’s request for cancellation. [read post]