Search for: "EDWARDS v. MUNICIPAL COURT" Results 101 - 120 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Code § 36-1-3-6(a) (when a statutory provision requires a power to be exercised in a specific manner, the municipality must exercise the power in that manner).In James Butler v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Cook, 159 Wash.2d 837, 154 P.3d 206 (Washington Supreme Court 2007 (quoting Tenore v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:52 am
The 8-1 ruling in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
”   Massillon Municipal Court Judge Edward Elum apparently didn’t place as much priority on that as I do. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 9:23 am by WSLL
Voigt delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Representing Harvey Levin, a fired state employee claiming age bias, will be Chicago attorney Edward R. [read post]
18 May 2022, 12:35 pm by Katherine Pompilio
   Rohini Kurup and Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
It can be difficult to hold governmental bodies accountable based on regulatory authority using the modified Anns/Cooper test in conjunction with Edwards v. the Law Society of Upper Canada.. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:05 am by Dylan Gibbs
Edwards, 2024 SCC 15According to the Supreme Court, Canada’s military court system can handle the truth. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:07 pm by WSLL
Edwards of Edwards Law Office, P.C., Etna, WyomingRepresenting Appellee (Plaintiff/Defendant): Audrey P. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
COURTS International Organizations Law Review (Netherlands), Volume 3, Number 1, 2006 Wessel, Ramses A, Editorial: The UN, the EU and Jus Cogens Amerasinghe, C.F., The Conundrum of Recourse to Force To Protect Persons Raab, Dominic, The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers O'Connell, Mary Ellen, A Note on UN v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Superior Court Judge Edward Torack should have alerted the husband's attorney that he and William Smith's professional relationship had resulted in litigation over the judge's departure from the firm 11 years earlier, and Smith should have alerted the court and opposing counsel that he could not give assurance that his client would not seek the judge's recusal, the Appellate Division held in Chandok v. [read post]