Search for: "EEOC v. Group Health Plan"
Results 101 - 120
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:19 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie recaps Wednesday’s oral arguments in EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
EEOC. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 5:58 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:58 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:21 pm
Plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:29 am
See e.g., Pfeil v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am
Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law, Past Chair of the ABA RPTE Employee Benefit & Other Compensation Arrangements Group, Co-Chair and Past Chair of the ABA RPTE Welfare Plan Committee, Vice Chair of the ABA TIPS Employee Benefit Plans Committee, Vice President of the North Texas Health Care Compliance Professionals Association, Past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Section and the former Board… [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:56 am
However, most employers are still seeking clarity in terms of how the decision impacts their group health plans. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The EEOC filed a complaint last week on behalf of three female employees against United Health Programs of America, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
EEOC v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:48 pm
According to the EEOC’s lawsuit in EEOC v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of… [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:17 am
Thus, it reversed summary judgment in Ford’s favor on the EEOC’s failure-to-accommodate and retaliation claims (EEOC v Ford Motor Co, April 22, 2014, Moore, K). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring… [read post]
