Search for: "EWING v. EWING" Results 101 - 120 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
Richworth Ltd v Billingham (2023) EW Misc 8 (CC) Over the years we’ve seen a number of county court decisions on the issue of when a deposit counts as returned for the purposes of being able to serve a section 21 notice (see here and the links in that report). [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 8:59 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Bryan v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 1568 (22 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) F (Children), Re [2008] EWCA Civ 842 (22 July 2008) CTI Group Inc v Transclear SA [2008] EWCA Civ 856 (22 July 2008) North Devon Homes Ltd. v Batchelor [2008] EWCA Civ 840 (22 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Hollis & Ors v Rolfe & Ors [2008] EWHC 1747 (Ch) (22 July 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench) Ewing… [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:15 am
The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that yesterday the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Webb v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 7:01 pm by Philip Mann
What’s truly amazing is that in the second of these (Voda v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Here's an updated list of the most downloaded IP papers that were posted on SSRN in the past 60 days:The AIA 500 Expanded: Effects of Patent Monetization Entities, by Sara Jeruss, Robin Feldman & Thomas Ewing (this study of 13,000 patent cases over 4 years has gotten lots of press; see press release, Thomson Reuters, Law.com, IPWatchdog)The Securitization of Patents, by Michael Risch (see guest post by author on PatentlyO)Patent Trolls by the Numbers, by Colleen V. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Grunwick Processing Laboratories Ltd v ACAS: The Social Contract, Trade Union Recognition, and the Rule of LawKD Ewing (King's College London, UK)7. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Kay Marbiah
  [1] Bloomberg LP v ZXC, [2022] UKSC 5, available here: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2020-0122-judgment.pdf [2] Judgment, para 13 [3] Judgment, para 18 [4] Judgment, para 21 [5] Judgment, para 67 [6] Judgment, para 50 [7] Judgment, para 81 [8] Judgment, para 108 [9] Judgment, para 111 [10] Judgment, para 116 [11] Judgment, para 121 [12] Judgment, para 142 [13] Judgment, para 127 [14] Judgment, para 140 [15] Judgment, paras 154 and 155 [16]… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:48 pm by familoo
h/t to @thesmallplaces who pointed out the news report, at which my mind duly boggled, but given the overall *cough* quality of the report I rather took it with a pinch of salt, assuming that it would be unlikely to have been reported in any event as it was County Court proceedings – although I note that on 13 May 2 judgments in unrelated County Court committal proceedings were published on BAILII: North Tyneside Council v Kornas [2013] EW Misc 4 (CC) (13 May… [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:17 am by Amanda Frost
The Court heard oral argument in American Electric Power v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 5:08 am by Darius Whelan
i=001-101536  López Ribalda v Spain (2018)http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2018/14.htmlAli v First Quench (2001)www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/446.htmlMcGowan v Scottish Water (2004)www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2004/0007_04_2309.htmlGresham Hotel (Case Study 6 of 2007)https://www.dataprotection.ie/docs/Case-Studies-2008/c/732.htm#6Westwood Swimming (2011)https://www.dataprotection.ie/docs/Case-Studies-2011/1212.htm#9Employee v… [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:42 am
The first one, authored by Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge), discusses two decisions, one of which is the passing off case Johnston v Archibald Orr Ewing & Co (1882). [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ewing, The Structural Articulation of 'Equal Dignity', (August 28, 2016).From SmartCILP:Zachary Bray, RLUIPA and the Limits of Religious Institutionalism, (2016 Utah Law Review 41-103).Julia L. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
I cannot answer the second question, but the Court of Appeals answers the first.The case is Ross v. [read post]