Search for: "Edward Hale"
Results 101 - 120
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
As Lady Hale said in her judgment [92]: “We are here because the ordinary law of tort does not recognise or compensate the anguish suffered by parents who are deprived of the life of their adult child. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:27 am
In Edwards the employer successfully applied to strike out Mr Edwards’ claim for damages of £3.8 million in so far as they exceeded the amount he would have received in his three month notice period. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
On Wednesday 1 February 2012 in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Walker, L Hale, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr and L Dyson) over two days is the appeal of Assange v The Swedish Judicial Authority. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
In the Privy Council starting on Wednesday 25 January 2012 in front of Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Mance, Clarke and Dyson is the matter of Dylan Simon v Manuel Paul Helmot, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Guernsey. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
These appeals from the Court of Appeal (Civ) will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance and Kerr. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
SVP Edward Burke also worked at Weil, and has also worked at Brobeck. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:48 am
Hilary Term begins in the Privy Council on Thursday 12 January 2012 with the one day hearing in front of Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr and Wilson of Rukhmin Balgobin v South West Regional Health Authority, which is on appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
Lady Hale dissented and would have found for the employees in both case. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Starting on Wednesday in Courtroom 2 of the Supreme Court is the two day hearing of In the matter of Peacock, which will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Walker, Brown and Wilson. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
Starting on Wednesday in Courtroom 2 of the Supreme Court is the two day hearing of In the matter of Peacock, which will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Walker, Brown and Wilson. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:46 pm
Obama's announcement follows the news that Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr appellate partner Edward DuMont has withdrawn his nomination for a spot on the Federal Circuit. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 5:25 am
"Edward DuMont asks Obama to withdraw his nomination to Federal Circuit": Sheri Qualters of The National Law Journal has an article (registration required) that begins, "Edward DuMont, an appellate litigation partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, has sent a letter to President Barack Obama asking him to withdraw his nomination to the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
This statement was referred to with approval by Sir Edward Coke in Co Litt 42a (1628), and much the same is stated in Brook’s New Cases (1554/5) pl 462. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
This statement was referred to with approval by Sir Edward Coke in Co Litt 42a (1628), and much the same is stated in Brook’s New Cases (1554/5) pl 462. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
