Search for: "Element Brand Holdings, LLC" Results 101 - 120 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Typically, plaintiffs who invoke § 8316 have invested resources in the development of a personal brand, and are suing to redress the unauthorized exploitation of that brand. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
In June 2019, Vitamin Energy was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by International IP Holdings, LLC, and Innovation Ventures, LLC, the owners of trademarks for 5-hour Energy liquid energy shots. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Each of those used the respective house brands and were mostly clear plastic over the card holding the device with promotional text/pictures. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
So, the Court clears the way to register a lot of these domain names, because this is not on its face a holding about how booking.com has secondary meaning, it is a holding about how the PTO didn’t meet the burden of showing that consumers perceive booking.com as the name of a service. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(IP Factor) Bar Ilan University holds premature ‘After Re Bilski’ conference (IP Factor)   Latin America Madrid protocol in Latin America: a nightmare or a dream? [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:55 am by Zamansky LLC
Nancy: Now there was something with brand ambassadors with FTX. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
Wyeth, LLC, 2012 WL 3575293, at *9 (E.D. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Iconix Luxembourg Holdings v Dream Pairs Europe [2023] EWHC 706 (Ch) (March 2023)Some of you may recognise the Umbro “double diamond” logo (owned by the claimant) below. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Further, as a limited-edition art object, the handbag holds value beyond its material components. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Thus Mr Turner [Counsel for Warner-Lambert], in his written submissions, whilst continuing to accept that the claim requires an element of "intention-like mens rea", submits that it is wrong to start with the word "intention" and embark on an exercise of deciding what that means, and to go on to hold that that form of intention must be attributed to the manufacturer. [read post]