Search for: "Elevation Co., Ltd."
Results 101 - 112
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2009, 12:42 pm
" Co-owners of Vital Living Therapeutic Massage, 5111 N. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
Realty Ltd. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:41 am
Individual/organisations £ K G Growers 3,170,052.01 G's Growers 2,908,857.66 Farmcare Limited 2,641,415.83 The Berryworld Producer Organisation 1,943,996,51 Strutt and Parker Limited 1,493,340.64 The National Trust 1,348,898.74 Sir Richard Suttons Settled Estate 1,264,889.52 Lilburn Estates Farming Partnership 1,215,740.15 Blankley Estates Ltd 1,189,030.63 Fruition Producer Organisation Limited 1,186,619.38 "We found the following information about these… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Otis Elevator Co., 861 F.2d 655, 660-61 (11th Cir. 1988); Simmons v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:55 am
Lynco Ltd. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:35 am
Chesterton Co. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
[Co-authored by Paul Bland and Alexis Rickher] In a series of decisions stemming back about 20 years, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Limitation periods start when a Plaintiff has, or ought to have, discovered, a viable cause of action for any head of damage. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
MIS appealed, and Horne cross-appealed against Southern Services.The court found, as Horne had conceded, that Southern Services had a qualified privilege, but no merit in Horne's contention that MIS did not have the qualified privilege found by the trial court, elevating dicta in the Court of Appeals' Wetherby v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 1:58 am
Intellectual property enthusiasts will recall his rulings in Polydor Ltd v Brown [2005] EWHC 3191 (Ch): ignorance no defence to copyright infringement action in respect of connecting a computer to the internet so that others could access audio files; Sawyer v Atari Interactive Inc [2005] EWHC 2351 (Ch) - English courts had jurisdiction to hear software dispute even though claim served in US; General Cigar Co v Partagas [2005] EWHC 1729 (Ch), the nightmare CIFUENTES/CIFUENTES WINKS… [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 1:44 am
His dissenting judgment in Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 213 (reported here on BAILII) is the most powerful and persuasive dissent the IPKat can recall reading. [read post]
