Search for: "Employers Mutual v. Liberty Mutual"
Results 101 - 120
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am
The pharmaceutical industry got a nice gift from the justices when in another 5-4 vote the justices in Mutual Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:52 am
The principle generates a robust normative framework for evaluating religious institutions’ claims, which the Article applies to a wide array of difficult questions, including the polygamy decision in Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
Every day, in ways big and small, we are strengthening the unique nation-to-nation relationship tribes enjoy with the United States—a relationship of mutual respect, mutual obligation and mutual trust. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:07 pm
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or destroyed… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or destroyed… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:23 pm
Indeed, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation, the insurers sued in the action, filed a Petition for Review on September 4, 2012, followed by a request to have the Court of Appeal’s decision depublished, as submitted by the California Employment Law Council. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 2:34 pm
Superior Court (Liberty Mutual Insurance Company), S205097—Depublished Court of Appeal Opinion and Review Denied [Kennard, J voting for review]—October 24, 2012 The issue is whether, under regulations promulgated by California’s Industrial Welfare Commission, an administrative exemption to overtime compensation requirements applies to insurance claims adjusters. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Liberty Mutual), No. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:19 am
Tarikonda v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
Superior Court (Liberty Mutual Ins. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
Background Facts and Earlier Proceedings in Harris I In this case, plaintiffs were claims adjusters at insurance companies Liberty Mutual and Golden Eagle. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Liberty Mutual Ins. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:40 pm
Superior Court (Liberty Mutual Ins. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:33 pm
” See Harris v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:05 am
Superior Court (Liberty Mutual), rejecting the oft-cited administrative/production worker dichotomy as a dispositive test for determining whether employees qualify for the administrative exemption. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
The court then distinguished Harrelson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
From the 26 states and other challengers, the story line is that the mandate is all about individuals’ liberty and their right to remain within the privacy of their own existence and not be compelled to venture out into the marketplace to buy something they do not want. [read post]
