Search for: "Engels v. Engels" Results 101 - 120 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 5:15 am by Anita Davies
The scope of art 6 rights have proved a problematic issue for the European Court of Human Rights in its jurisprudence, and a considerable body of case law has been required to clarify and define the terms ‘charge’ and ‘criminal’ under art 6 (see Engel v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:30 am by Daniel Sokol
The case of Engel v The Netherlands (no. 1) (1976) 1 EHRR 647 put forward three factors when deciding whether or not a person is charged with a criminal offence: The classification of the proceedings under national law (i.e., whether they are classed as civil or criminal proceedings); The ‘essential’ nature of the proceedings; The penalty that the applicant risks incurring. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm by J. Adam Engel
An upcoming law review article highlights the “missed opportunity” presented by the Jones GPS tracking case:  It’s Raining Katz and Jones: The Implications of United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm by J. Adam Engel
An upcoming law review article highlights the “missed opportunity” presented by the Jones GPS tracking case:  It’s Raining Katz and Jones: The Implications of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
” It advances a proposal bolstered by five pillars to address the causes of migration in the region:  Pillar I: Addressing economic insecurity and inequality  Pillar II: Combating corruption, strengthening democratic governance, and advancing the rule of law Pillar III: Promoting respect for human rights, labor rights, and a free press  Pillar IV: Countering and preventing violence, extortion, and other crimes perpetrated by criminal gangs, trafficking networks, and other… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 5:36 am by Joanna Nicholson
In human rights law, the European Court of Human Rights has held that the interpretation and application of the European Convention of Human Rights can be different when being applied to members of state armed forces than to civilians (Engel v The Netherlands (No 1) (1976) 1 ECtHR 647). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:43 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
Part One: Elemental “When I read Hugo Black’s decision in the school prayer case, Engel v. [read post]