Search for: "England v. Department of Defense"
Results 101 - 120
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2009, 1:08 am
The Justice Department, which recently announced in a court filing that its lawyers were no longer representing Yoo, said it will still pay for Yoo's defense, "as is normal practice when the potential exists for disagreement between the government and the defendant over complex legal questions. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Our condolences to these departed relists. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Perhaps our founding fathers were right when they went to war after the king of England tried to seize our gunpowder? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
In granting the injunction, she simply indicated that the Justice Department was likely, but not certain, to prevail on those points at a later trial in federal court. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:20 am
Hearing Details Gill et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 12:10 pm
Sabatino, is describing the effect of Crawford v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Breyer also announced the judgment and delivered a plurality opinion yesterday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520; phone: 202-736-7000, FAX: 202-647-2835.) [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm
Nichols v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
Apple is suing Samsung in California over "slide to unlock", but a little-known Swedish touchscreen phone, the Neonode N1m, already had that feature (though Apple's version undoubtedly has a more elaborate graphical representation) well before the iPhone was launched:For the most part the Apple v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
He said he acted in self-defense. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am
The concept of “attainder” by legislation dates back at least to 16th Century England. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:49 pm
The case is Ashcroft v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:40 am
The 2007 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
See Tibbs v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm
The Court’s opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
