Search for: "English v. Industrial Commission"
Results 101 - 120
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
The consultation paper is extremely English-focused. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:47 pm
For example, in its decision the Commission said: “… in the Commission’s view, the proposed transaction warrants close scrutiny due to concentration of ownership and market dominance in television and radio in both English- and French-language markets. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:16 am
The '074 patent does not define the term "channel map information," nor does this term appear to have any ordinary English meaning. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Vaughan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
The five-to-three decision in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
CG v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
Also promoted to the Court of Appeal in the same batch of ten are Sir Geoffrey Vos (remember United Airlines v United Airways, here, Lady Gaga v Moshi Monsters, here?) [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:40 am
Robert Lawson, Tim Marland p.99-108 # Sovereignty and the Chicago Convention: English Court of Appeal Rules on the Northern Cyprus Question Mark Franklin p.109-116 # Metal Neutrality and the Nation-Bound Airline Industry Paul V. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
–Darnaa v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
In Wood v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police ([2005] EMLR 20) a police officer responsible for investigating a series of car thefts had informed members of the insurance industry that the claimant’s business partner was guilty of the thefts. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has considered the implementation of the English Courts modernisation. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
– the English abstract reads as follows: The article discusses the proposal for a consumer rights directive of October 2008, in which the European Commission suggests to move from minimum to full harmonisation of specific areas of consumer contract law. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
The consultation paper is extremely focused on English law. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
McEwen* Introduction The American Invents Act is a result of pressures from diverse industries and groups. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
Also, English proficiency was not required in order to perform any of the jobs in Job Group 070. [read post]
