Search for: "English v. Industrial Commission" Results 101 - 120 of 348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
The Disciplinary Board found a serious and obvious error in the Examiner's Report and remitted the script back to the Examination Board for re-marking.Tristan Sherliker discusses the English Court of Appeal's judgment in ZyXEL v TQ Delta [2019] EWCA Civ 1277.DesignsKatfriend Ewan Grist analyses English design decisions over the past 12 years finding that there is quite a lot for designers and design owners to feel content about.Book ReviewsHayleigh Bosher reviews… [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by skelly
When Congress passed the Federal Liability Risk Retention Act of 1986 in response to skyrocketing insurance premiums being charged for, and the lack of available, commercial liability insurance, a new regime was born. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:34 pm by Tom Zagorsky
A firm’s Form CRS should be written in plain English; indeed, firms are instructed to avoid using legal jargon and highly technical terms. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:53 am by Saskia Hayes, CMS
Saskia also acted for a number of insurers in responding to, and appearing before, the Australian Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
In a blog post the Irish Data Protection Commission considers right to rectification complaints under Article 16 of the GDPR. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:22 am by CMS
The industry has also had to grapple with the apportionment of liability arising from vehicles used in the commission of crime. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
Nor is there any guidance in the CJEU decision in Huawei v ZTE (ECU:EU:C.2015 - 477) nor in the Guidance issued by the European Commission (CoM [2017] 712 final 29.11.2017). [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
", considers the interaction between the specific jurisdictional rules regarding claims involving EU unitary IP rights and the jurisdictional rules under the Brussels regulation in light of the CJEU decisions in case C-617/15 (Hummel v Nike) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive) and the subsequent English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor.Book ReviewsSpecialKat… [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Joseph Peacock
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Excellent oral and written English skills, good understanding of French and/or Spanish. [read post]