Search for: "English v. Stevens" Results 101 - 120 of 385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2019, 5:39 pm by Ken Moon
 The appeal decision in Capitol Records v ReDigi issued December 2018 did not attract anywhere near the same attention as the 2015 trial decision. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
DiNapoli, Office of New York State Comptroller, on Sunday, June 16, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, New York, Pension funds, Stewardship, Sustainability Mootness Fees Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley), on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tags: Class actions, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers… [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Subsequently, while returning to the English fleet, the Bellipotent battles an enemy ship. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Jaffa -- I also draw extensively from constitutional argument advanced by lawyers in The American Bar Association Journal, journalists like James Jackson Kilpatrick in National Review (and elsewhere), literature scholars/English Professors (the late Jeffrey Hart; M.E. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Rouhandeh, and Michael Kaplan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Bonds, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Misconduct, Rule 144, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Volkswagen 2019 Proposed Amendments to DGCL Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens’ argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens' argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Panel - Policy Surveillance for Public Health Advancement Moderator: Benjamin Meier, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Jamie Chriqui, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health Steven Hoffman, Osgoode Hall Law School Nadia Sawicki, Loyola University Chicago School of Law B. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
  There was the first English “right to be forgotten” case and the most high profile case of the year was that brought by Sir Cliff Richard against the BBC. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1852 case of Moore v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm by Brooke
  Also reviewed at H-Net is Steven M. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:37 pm by Randy Barnett
Ok, if you look at the Heller case—and I'm talking about the DC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:37 am by Randy Barnett
Ok, if you look at the Heller case—and I'm talking about the DC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Justice Gorsuch’s solo dissent from Monday’s ruling in Sveen v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Therefore, the OD decided that the document was not admitted into the proceedings.II.2.3   Should the Technical Expert announced by the PP be allowed to speak:41              By letter of 13.11.2017, the PP had announced Steven Trybus as a TechnicalExpert to be heard during the oral proceedings and indicated that he was an expert in US law. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers continue to focus on Monday’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]