Search for: "Ex Parte Crawford"
Results 101 - 110
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
Crawford, 171 S.W.3d 323, 338 (Tex. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:54 am
Not So Easy - bit.ly/z5GZUe (Tam Harbert) Hacker Points to Weakness in LexisNexis Concordance - bit.ly/zjdXby (Evan Koblentz) Landmark E-Discovery Decision Recognizes the Appropriateness of Predictive Coding Review - bit.ly/yiwBVk (Squire Sanders) Electronic Medical Records: Legal Risks of Going Paperless - bit.ly/yLrr5x (Alicia Gallegos) Employment Discrimination Protocols for Discovery: They’re Coming - bit.ly/ycL6GF (Daniel Schwartz) Ethics… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
Here are the results: I just needed or job, or a different job; there was an opening and I took it. (53 out of 216, 25%) I was in a related field, and it turned into workers’ compensation (51 out of 216, 24%) I was looking for a job and the skills required seemed to be a good fit for me (39 out of 216, 18%) I was asked, volunteered, or was forced to take over workers’ comp at my company; or I grew into it internally (started in the mail room and worked up). (39 out of 216,… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained in Jacobellis v… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained in Jacobellis v… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Upton); ex post facto clause challenges ( Trotter v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Sexton, No. 05-6412, 05-6415, 05-6416 Defendants' sentences for offenses stemming from the distribution of cocaine, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the district court violated their Sixth Amendment and due process rights by using its own factual findings to calculate their sentencing ranges under the Guidelines; 2) the sentences exceeded the "maximum statutory sentence" allowable for their offenses; 3) imposition of their sentences… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Crawford, No. 05-4173-CV-C, 2006WL 1779035 (W.D. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
[www.markschwab.us]http://www.markschwab.us/legal/Filed_06-26-2008_Initial_Brief.pdf IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-1199 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, Death Warrant Signed Execution July 1, 2008 STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee. [read post]