Search for: "Ex Parte Crouch"
Results 101 - 120
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2014, 9:40 am
By Dennis Crouch Ex parte Dan, 2014 WL 343818, Appeal No. 12-8847, APN 10/715,910 (PTAB 2014) Monsanto’s patent application covers the growth of plant cells on a bed of lipoic acid in order to facilitate a GM transformation. [read post]
The Paramount Interest in Seeing that Patent Monopolies . . . are Kept Within their Legitimate Scope
31 Jan 2014, 5:05 am
By Dennis Crouch Courts have often identified patent rights as a form of monopoly. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
In Ex Parte Miyazaki, 89 USPQ2d 1207 (B.P.A.I. 2008), the Board of Patent Appeals revived the old precedent of Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
In Ex Parte Miyazaki, 89 USPQ2d 1207 (B.P.A.I. 2008), the Board of Patent Appeals revived the old precedent of Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:35 pm
By Dennis Crouch Ex Parte Gross (PTAB 2014) Patent attorney J. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:44 am
By Dennis Crouch Ex Parte Ciprian Agapi, 2013 WL 6039024 (PTAB 2013) The PTAB continues to decide a large number of subject matter eligibility issues. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 8:13 am
The backlog of pending ex parte appeals is large – over 25,000 pending cases. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:31 am
By Dennis Crouch This is a continuation of an analysis of ex parte appeal decision outcomes at the US Patent Office (USPTO). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 11:02 pm
By Dennis Crouch The chart above provides further analysis from the prior post entitled Ex Parte Appeal Outcome by Assignee 2005-2013. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
As a reminder, in ex parte cases, the PTAB reviews rejections by the patent examiner. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:58 pm
By Dennis Crouch Ex parte Mewherter (PTAB 2013) The USPTO has recently designated Ex parte Mewherter as a precedential decision with regards to its treatment of rejections under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:51 pm
Judge Saris also found that correction of inventorship was not a "core sovereign interest sufficient to make this a dispute between States," but that the case could proceed against the named officials under the Ex parte Young doctrine. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:30 pm
by Dennis Crouch Inter Partes Review of U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 12:48 pm
In 2009, a competitor (Merial Ltd., a Sanofi compani) filed an ex parte reexamination request. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:56 pm
Patenting Device Attached to a Human is OK: Ex Parte Robert S. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:16 pm
By Dennis Crouch The PTAB continues to work on its 26,000+ backlog of ex parte appeals pending at the USPTO. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:45 am
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:16 pm
By Dennis Crouch The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is turning a corner in terms of its backlog of pending ex parte appeals with a significant drop in the backlog in March 2013. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Post-Grant Proceedings: Request for ex parte reexamination: $12,000 down from $17,750. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:30 am
Ex Parte Reexamination: Down from $17,750 to $12,000, small and micro entity privileges apply. [read post]
