Search for: "Ex Parte N.C."
Results 101 - 120
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 11:46 am
Hembree, 368 N.C. 2 (2015), a case in which the state supreme court reversed a murder conviction based on the State’s excessive use of Rule 404(b) evidence. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:05 am
Hanner, 188 N.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:05 am
Hanner, 188 N.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
Bishop, __ N.C. __; 2016 WL 3221098 (N.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
., 336 U.S. 490 (1949) (`[I]t has never been deemed an abridgment of freedom of speech or press to make a course of conduct illegal merely because the conduct was in part initiated, evidenced, or carried out by means of language, either spoken, written, or printed’). . . ; see also R.A.V. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:13 am
Watson, 169 N.C. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
See infra Part I.A. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Gregory Elder’s wife sought an ex parte DVPO in September 2010. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:32 am
But see Ex parte Tarver, 725 S.W.2d 195 (Tx. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
No. 204, 636 F.3d 874 (7th Cir. 2011); Holloman ex rel. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:54 am
State ex rel. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:44 am
Where a child’s interest in being protected from abuse and neglect is weighed against parental rights to procedural due process, the Court will almost always grant an ex-parte order so as to protect the interest of the child. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:24 am
North Carolina State Board of Elections, 331 N.C. 335 (1992), but interpreted the statutes to mean a vacancy election was only for an unexpired term. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:18 pm
It also provides for ex parte orders for preservation of evidence and seizure of any property used, in any manner or part, to commit or facilitate a violation of the statute, using the procedure contained in the Lanham Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 1:45 pm
The complaint, notice of hearing, and any temporary or ex parte order that has been issued must be attached. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 11:23 am
Byrd, 363 N.C. 214 (2009), the state supreme court concluded that an ex parte domestic violence protective order, or DVPO, was not a “valid protective order” for purposes of the sentencing enhancement under G.S. 50B-4.1(d). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:24 am
Clarified that § 11.305 (relating to prohibited ex parte communications with, e.g., judges, administrative patent and trademark judges, and "employee[s] or officer[s] of the Office") does not "prevent ex parte communication that is authorized by law, rule or court order, in an ex parte proceeding." [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am
See id. at 649 (quoting Chief Justice Marshall in Ex parte Burr, 22 U.S. 529, 530 (1824)). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:03 am
Department of Transportation, 122 N.C. [read post]
