Search for: "Ex parte Crawford" Results 101 - 120 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Charles Johnson
They are also considered separate offenses for purposes of sentencing and of challenges under the Constitution’s ex post facto and double jeopardy clauses. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Tanden would have a hand in policies that touch every part of the economy after years spent courting corporate and foreign donors at the think tank Center for American Progress. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 11:32 pm by Administrator
Among them, there can be a reasonable apprehension of bias, partiality, or predetermination on the part of the trial judge. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
However, if there was any further reason to provide a security classification guide to the defense, it would first have to go through a screening process wherein the judge would determine which parts were relevant and material to the defense. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Businesses whose employees are the targets of violent stalkers or jealous exes, or perhaps even the targets themselves, g., Rojas v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:58 am by Jack Goldsmith, Nathaniel Sobel
Barr gave the third interview to CBS’s Jan Crawford on May 31. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Government Watchdog Says White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows Spent Campaign Funds on Personal Expenditures Business Insider – Yelena Dzhanova | Published: 10/31/2020 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is calling for an investigation into White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows after accusing him of misusing thousands of dollars in campaign funds. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Gregory
In the Estate of Clive Douglas Crawford (Deceased) [2014] NZHC 609. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Vaughn, No. 04-1623 Grant of a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) defendant was prejudiced by his attorney's failure to object to evidence relating to a racketeering charge; and 2) the evidence was independently admissible to prove the remaining charges against defendant, and he was therefore not prejudiced with respect to some charges. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
Not So Easy - bit.ly/z5GZUe (Tam Harbert) Hacker Points to Weakness in LexisNexis Concordance - bit.ly/zjdXby (Evan Koblentz) Landmark E-Discovery Decision Recognizes the Appropriateness of Predictive Coding Review - bit.ly/yiwBVk (Squire Sanders) Electronic Medical Records: Legal Risks of Going Paperless - bit.ly/yLrr5x (Alicia Gallegos) Employment Discrimination Protocols for Discovery: They’re Coming - bit.ly/ycL6GF (Daniel Schwartz) Ethics… [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
 Here are the results:   I just needed or job, or a different job; there was an opening and I took it. (53 out of 216, 25%) I was in a related field, and it turned into workers’ compensation (51 out of 216, 24%) I was looking for a job and the skills required seemed to be a good fit for me (39 out of 216, 18%) I was asked, volunteered, or was forced to take over workers’ comp at my company; or I grew into it internally (started in the mail room and worked up). (39 out of 216,… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained in Jacobellis v… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained in Jacobellis v… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Upton); ex post facto clause challenges ( Trotter v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Sexton, No. 05-6412, 05-6415, 05-6416 Defendants' sentences for offenses stemming from the distribution of cocaine, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the district court violated their Sixth Amendment and due process rights by using its own factual findings to calculate their sentencing ranges under the Guidelines; 2) the sentences exceeded the "maximum statutory sentence" allowable for their offenses; 3) imposition of their sentences… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Crawford, No. 05-4173-CV-C, 2006WL 1779035 (W.D. [read post]