Search for: "Ex parte Moore"
Results 101 - 120
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently decided Moore v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled otherwise, concluding that precedent required the lower court to apply the intellectual disability standards set forth in Ex parte Briseno, 135 S.W. 3d 1 (Tex. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
The claimants include actor David Tennant and ex Formula One driver Eddie Irvine. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 10:51 am
It relied on its 2004 decision in another case, Ex parte Briseno, involving an inmate’s intellectual disability. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:05 am
At a minimum, the five-Justice majority ruled in the case of Moore v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Techdirt reports that a US law firm has been fined $71,000 for filing legal claims based on false documents as part of a ‘reputation management strategy. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Law provides no protection for an attorney whose sociopathic ex-husband plans to murder her. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Law provides no protection for an attorney whose sociopathic ex-husband plans to murder her. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am
The family decision has not been reported in the media to the best of our knowledge and the helpful lack of detail may in part account for that. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
On 15 February 2017, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the case of Bains v Moore [2017] EWHC 242 (QB). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
The law school that Heikkinen joined in 1947 was thriving, as more than 400 students, many of whom were ex-GI’s, streamed into its hallways. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Upton); ex post facto clause challenges ( Trotter v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Singer Ciara has dropped her $15 million defamation suit against her ex-fiancé Future Friday, a year after she first accused the rapper of slander. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
State ex rel. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:07 am
State ex rel. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:38 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) to prohibit the use of current medical standards on intellectual disability, and require the use of outdated medical standards, in determining whether an individual may be executed.See any issue there about whether the Texas standard of Ex parte Briseno ever conformed to the subsequently "outdated" standards in the first place? [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:09 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:05 am
It is also apparent that certain Alabama state courts do not view this Court’s ruling in Searcy as binding precedent....The Court notes that the Supreme Court of Alabama denied the pending mandamus petitions and entered judgment in Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
