Search for: "Examination Board, et al. v. International Association, et al." Results 101 - 120 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
Despite the notoriety this figure has gained, few scholars seem to have examined the SEC’s basis for arriving at this figure. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
Stigsson et al., The influence of the solvent system used during manufacturing of CMC; Cellulose, 2006, 13, pages 705 to 712;D16: Technical Report filed by the Applicant on 7 November 2012 (during substantive examination); andD19: "Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar", Oxford University Press Inc, New York, 1994, entry "disjunctive".The Opposition Division came inter alia to the conclusions- that Article 100(b) EPC did not prejudice the maintenance of… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(Just an Examiner) Clean tech in court: Green patent complaint update (Green Patent Blog) Guest post: Mark Twain’s patent interference (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC on BPAI in In re Leithem: “This conclusory analysis is hardly persuasive (IPBiz) CAFC finds construction of term unnecessary: Respironics v Invacare (nonprecedential) (GRAY on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking statute is constitutional: Luka v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
DLA Piper has produced a helpful summary of the European Data Protection Board’s (EDPR) draft Guidelines on the Interplay between the application of Article 3 and the provision on international transfers as per Chapter V of the  GDPR. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Microsoft et al.[25]   In Motionless Keyboard, the inventor of a new keyboard showed his keyboard to investors, a friend, a business partner  and a typist prior to filing an application. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Desmarais’s key cross-examination and concludes that: “During the trial Rambus’ lawyers were outmaneuvered at every turn by a team from the New York office of Kirkland & Ellis. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: PAGO International GmbH v Tirol Milch registrierte Genossenschaft mbH (IPKat) ECJ to hear Volker Merkel & Ors v OHIM - Is PATENTCONSULT the new BABY-DRY? [read post]
Noting that legislation, regulation, international accords, business trends, and physical impacts of climate change could all affect a registrant’s operations or results, the release “remind[ed] companies of their obligations under existing federal securities laws” “to consider climate change and its consequences as they prepare documents to be filed with us and provided to investors. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)   Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda)   Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46)   Russia Video… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
Sandgrund and Sullan.Reproduced by permission of the Colorado Bar Association Vol. 39, August, 2010, pg. 89-96, (c) Colorado Bar Association 2010. [read post]