Search for: "FLOWERS v. THE STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
” Flowers Foods had argued that there is no split in the circuits, that the Supreme Court in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 6:00 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
The second action came in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 1:09 pm
(Sale of Trust Lands; Civil Rights Acts; Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Lela Mae Flowers v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
Flowers Bakeries, LLC, Case No. 13-1725 (D.D.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 8:33 am
The justices once again did not act on several high-profile petitions for review that they considered at last week’s conference, including a case involving whether the state of Washington violated a florist’s constitutional rights by requiring her to provide flowers for same-sex weddings despite her religious objections and a challenge to a 2018 rule that expanded the definition of “machinegun” under federal law to include “bump-stocks” –… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:17 am
They hold a special place in our hearts because they are the state flower. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 1:23 pm
In the present case, the development of condos at Ninth and Flower in LA -- next to the Staples Center. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:30 am
Back in 2009, in O’Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
In Chapman v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:49 pm
Quill Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 11:52 am
” She stated that this was done during work hours. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:52 am
For the most recent Tennessee case on the issue see Flowers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
As the courtroom saga unfolds, M&A players and practitioners should keep a watchful eye – not since In re IBP Inc. v. [read post]