Search for: "FOY v. STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
25 May 2019, 9:33 am
Samama v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
Surveillance On 27 April the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner published a FOI response. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:22 am
Yesterday, the Third Circuit weighed in on an employee's 14th Amendment right to privacy in Doe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Guindon v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:43 pm
Rhode Island Assoc. of Realtors v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
FOI Act 2000, s 58. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Action4Canada v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2022 BCSC 1507 (CanLII) [71] Put simply, individuals have standing to question whether state actions infringe their Charter protected rights. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Morland-Jones v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
A campaign to ‘save FoI’ launches today. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
This is discussed on the UK FOI Blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
The same proposition is sometimes stated as prohibiting an appellate [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
"Detailed analysis of Federal Circuit hearing in Oracle v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
In the case of Hategan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am
Although the European Court of Human Rights this week struck a blow to the marriage equality campaign in Schalk and Kopf v Austria by holding that Article 12 of the ECHR (the right to marriage) did not oblige states to ensure marriage equality, the reasoning was based on the lack of a European consensus on the matter. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:16 am
Housen v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:21 pm
In Dep’t of Public Safety v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
Freedom of Information The Panopticon blog examines FOI requests into the diary of Andrew Lansley, and provides a fresh perspective on Evans. [read post]
