Search for: "FRENCH v. STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2014, 3:40 pm
Plan v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 11:45 pm
However, Epic Games v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:02 am
Cecile Martin A few months after the European Court of Justice ruled on May 13, 2014 that search engines are considered personal data controllers under the EU Data Protection Directive of 1995 and, as such, should provide data subjects with a right to be forgotten, a French Tribunal enforced this principle in X & Y v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:02 am
Cecile Martin A few months after the European Court of Justice ruled on May 13, 2014 that search engines are considered personal data controllers under the EU Data Protection Directive of 1995 and, as such, should provide data subjects with a right to be forgotten, a French Tribunal enforced this principle in X & Y v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:59 am
The Third Department was confronted with such a situation on June 7th in Matter of Fireman's Assn. of State of New York v French Am. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Plessy v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 1:41 pm
It seems like Justice Mosk gets this one right, and that the "provisional" French judgment is subject to enforcement in the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In J.C. and Others v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
The result stated that she was the mother with an accuracy of 99.99%. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 7:27 am
State Emp. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
