Search for: "Fay v State"
Results 101 - 120
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
In this week’s case (Morris v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:20 pm
Fay Observer reports that: Jurors in the court-martial of a Fort Bragg soldier [United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 2:45 pm
The next February, Griffin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Fayed v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:30 am
Don, don’t you recall your lonely campaign to expose Mohammed Al Fayed’s past? [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm
No other state has anything comparable in its laws. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
The argument was mentioned in Fayed v United Kingdom ((1994) 18 EHRR 393) and it was accepted in Rotaru v Romania ((2000) 8 BHRC 449 [44]). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
The case, Saleh et al v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:27 am
Bd. of Educ., 466 F.3d 232] nor local school districts in New York State were arms of the state [Fay v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:07 am
Fay, 905 N.E.2d 747 (Ill. 2009). [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:25 am
In Mann v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
Fay claims that rates of drugs use over the past 40 years have fallen further in the United States than in Portugal. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
Bd. of Educ., 466 F.3d 232] nor local school districts in New York State were arms of the state [Fay v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kowalski, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 700 (19 March 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Reynolds v Stone Rowe Brewer (a firm) [2008] EWHC 497 (QB) (18 March 2008) Geniki Investments International Ltd. v Ellis Stockbrokers Ltd [2008] EWHC 549 (QB) (19 March 2008) Al-Rawas v Pegasus Energy Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 617 (QB) (08 April 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Wells v Pilling Parish Council [2008]… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]