Search for: "Federal Insurance Company v. Trading Technologies International, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
Sundance Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael… [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
Stamer works closely with employer and other plan sponsors, insurance and financial services companies, plan fiduciaries, administrators, and vendors and others to design, administer and defend effective legally defensible employee benefits and compensation practices, programs, products and technology. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (8th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-1254 Title: Zurich American Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Supreme CourtMatrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
However, if the federal courts decline to follow the Delaware courts’ lead, federal court merger objection litigation could remain an important corporate and securities litigation phenomenon, representing a significant litigation exposure for companies and for their D&O insurers. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
In the SEC’s Examination Priorities, published on January 12, 2017, the SEC warned publicly traded companies that it will be investigating cybersecurity practices with higher scrutiny.[18] Specifically, the SEC states that “[i]n 2017, we will continue our initiative to examine for cybersecurity compliance procedures and controls, including testing and implementation of those procedures and controls. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
In the SEC’s Examination Priorities, published on January 12, 2017, the SEC warned publicly traded companies that it will be investigating cybersecurity practices with higher scrutiny.[18] Specifically, the SEC states that “[i]n 2017, we will continue our initiative to examine for cybersecurity compliance procedures and controls, including testing and implementation of those procedures and controls. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
Well known for her extensive work with health care, insurance and other highly regulated entities on corporate compliance, internal controls and risk m [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Mastercard Inc.; 7:21-cv-10180, Kenter v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Mastercard Inc.; 7:21-cv-10180, Kenter v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
Well known for her extensive work with health care, insurance and other highly regulated entities on corporate compliance, internal controls and risk management, her clients range from highly regulated entities like employers, contractors and their employee benefit plans, their sponsors, management, administrators, insurers, fiduciaries and advisors, technology and data service providers, health care, managed care and insurance, financial services,… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
We also find no discernible effect on organizational commitment, but a significant boost to perceived legal compliance by the company, raising important questions about the trade-off between voice and exit and formal versus informal aspects of dispute resolution mechanisms.In Whose Shoes? [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 7:24 am
Continuing Developments in Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:45 pm
Feb. 16, 2010). http://tinyurl.com/yb5p3ge Star Direct Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Beaulne, 2015 QCCS 1562 http://t.co/UyCkzy9qqE -> Guest commentary: Boston’s law firms are targets for cyber criminals http://t.co/37MCtBaeB7 -> Mandated “fair use” language has no place in trade promotion authority http://t.co/eVgq69wy8J -> Limitations on testimonial advertising does not infringe Charter rights College v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
TTAB denies another summary judgment motion as defendant claims innocence, non-falsity: Factory Mutual Insurance Company and FM Approvals LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
See Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
