Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Smith" Results 101 - 120 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 2:46 am
Here, on "Let the Dance Begin: the FTC PAE Study is On", Arleen Malley Zank writes on the fact that, in the US, the Federal Trade Commission has received the go-ahead for a major review of patent assertion entities: the budget allows for nearly 30,000 person-hours between now and the end of August 2017 to examine the impact of PAEs on the IP monetisation ecosystem (katpat to Nigel Sywcher for unearthing the link). [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP)   Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)  PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am by Dan Lopez
There’s been cases brought by the Federal Trade Commission against Facebook by the Justice Department, against Google and by state’s Attorney General. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Patentology) WIPO issues PCT Notification No. 196 (IPKat) PCT Applications – Top national stage countries for 2010 (inovia) Licensee buys Licensor in advance of IPO: Smith Electric Vehicles UK and Smith Electric Vehicles US (IP finance) In defence of trolls (IP Factor) Global – Copyright ACTA the sequel: The Transpacific Partnership Agreement (Public Knowledge) Australia Warning labels threaten tobacco trade-marks – Or do they? [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79 Donald S. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79 Donald S. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm by Jason Rantanen
Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79 Donald S. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79 Donald S. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79 Donald S. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
For times like this … it’s Relist Watch Select. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 8:16 am by Kate Tummarello
In a March decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2)… [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
  The federal court filing comes after the US International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an early ruling that Motorola had not infringed the patents at dispute in an ITC claim brought by Apple. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
: Canadian voices on copyright law’ documentary produced by Michael Geist and Daniel Albahary (Michael Geist) (Coverage of the film – Michael Geist) (Techdirt) IP & the economy – never allow a crisis to go to waste (Excess Copyright) Sleeman Breweries files lawsuit against Dead Frog Brewery over Dead Frog’s use of clear glass bottle design (Canadian Trademark Blog)   China Investigation orders in IP cases (China Hearsay) Negotiating with IP… [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:23 am by Ronald Mann
Return Mail, by contrast, points to provisions in the AIA indicating that the results of the post-grant review proceedings would bar later challenges to the validity of a patent in federal district court or the International Trade Commission. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79 Donald S. [read post]