Search for: "Fernandez v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:28 am
According to a New York appellate decision, Fernandez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 12:11 pm
The outcome hinged on the Ninth’s lead use immunity case, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Rodriguez-Dod, The Intersection of Law, Religion, and Infectious Disease on the Handling and Disposition of Human Remains, (Law, Religion, and Health in the United States (Holly Fernandez Lynch, I. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:41 am
United States, 420 F.3d 1197, 1204-05 (10th Cir.2005) (discussing circuit split).In addition, it is far from apparent whether the Tenants would have standing to bring their counterclaim. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 6:54 am
Fernandez-Castillo, 324 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 6:40 am
But this morning, the Supreme Court in this order list granted cert on an related issue: 24-556 FERNANDEZ, JOE V. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:04 am
Since it's a very interesting piece of work in its own right, I'll help Name That Tune by giving a fairly expansive snippet thereof:"Four months ago, in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
