Search for: "Field v. Acres" Results 101 - 120 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Bill Ward
Corp., 933 N.E.2d 721, 892 N.Y.S.2d 8 (2010), and the New Jersey Supreme Court in Gallenthin v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Furthermore, this case should not be read to conflict with another very recent case out of the Fourth Appellate District – Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Furthermore, this case should not be read to conflict with another very recent case out of the Fourth Appellate District – Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
The Planning Commission of the City of New York, please click on the following link: [www.nycourts.gov] ------------------- *The Court also noted that the new facilities will feature: "a running track; a soccer field, little league and softball fields; sixteen tennis courts; nine handball courts; four basketball courts, including one with bleachers; a tot-lot with climbing and play equipment; and areas for the passive enjoyment of the park. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:17 am by Joseph D. Kearney
The Parens Patriae Model In 1892, in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
  Community activists from the south side neighborhood surrounding Washington Park are expressing discontent with the city's plan to build in their park.[13]  Chicago's bid calls for the erection of a temporary 80,000-seat stadium on one of Chicago's largest green spaces.[14]  Upon completion of the Games, the stadium will be reduced to a 5,000-seat amphitheater.[15]  If the Olympics come to Chicago, however, the 350-acre park park that… [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 10:11 am
Along with the cigarette law preemption case, the Court will hear another case on whether federal law has taken over the field — here, the enactment of state laws that impose their own labeling requirements to assure that drugs are safe for use (Wyeth v. [read post]