Search for: "Fields v. Eu"
Results 101 - 120
of 761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2009, 5:41 am
Hartley, The Integration Theory v Acquired Rights. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:15 pm
Clair v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm
In the law enforcement field the EU has proposed a Regulation on EU Production and Preservation Orders (the ‘e-Evidence Regulation’) and associated Directive that would set up a regime for some cross-border requests direct to service providers. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
Varese, V. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* Retail omerta: Wilko v Buyology David pens a note on last week's High Court of Justice, England and Wales, decision in Wilko Retail Ltd v Buyology Ltd. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
Better still, EU legal acts will bear unique, sequential numbers. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent cases | AIPPI (UK) Event: 2016's patent cases - all you really need to know | BREAKING: CJEU rules that EU law does NOT prevent punitive damages in IP cases | Supreme Court rules Act of Parliament is needed to initiate UK leaving the EU| Book review: "From Maimonides to Microsoft: The Jewish Law of Copyright Since the Birth of Print"| Applications for… [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:04 am
The questionnaire is likely to have limited space for responses and/or no open-field questions. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
The Court held, in paragraph 43 of United Kingdom v Parliament and Council, that by using the expression ‘measures for the approximation’ in Article 95 EC the authors of the Treaty intended to confer on the EU legislature a discretion as regards the method of approximation most appropriate for achieving the desired result, in particular in fields with complex technical features. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm
Nonetheless, in the face of Article 9 of the Charter of Fundamental Freedoms of the EU, the Court relented a little. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:11 pm
Kermit might not find it easy being green, but everyone's favorite frog obviously wrote that song before he started following Environmental Law on JD Supra - a stream of daily updates from some of the finest lawyers and law firms in the field. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:31 am
First, it did not prove that even EU IP lawyers would disregard the registration of design patents in the USA. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:46 am
It is debatable whether ‘Black Friday’ is perceived as such a common name, e.g., for ‘retail services via the Internet in the fields of: cosmetics’. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:51 am
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
They came to the conclusion that CJEU judges are not exactly experts in the field, Mark reports. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm
The emergence of DP as a major field of EU law has, for example, no doubt changed its character as it is now geared to the general principles and enforcement methods of EU law. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:13 am
I don't think Nokia's latest round of offers would obviate a referral of component-level licensing questions to the Court of Justice of the EU with respect to Nokia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
| Italian Supreme Court confirms availability of copyright protection to TV formats | EU certification mark: It's coming your way on October 1st | Pemetrexed pops up in Milan | Medical data in a twist - Technomed v Bluecrest | Proposed EMA relocation: staff survey update | Event: The impact of Brexit on the UK copyright regime | Waiting for the approval of the EU Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market | 'TOBBIA' EU trade mark declared… [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
