Search for: "Fields v. Southern Company Services"
Results 101 - 120
of 246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2017, 7:16 am
A couple years ago, a real-life, above-water company IJR Capital Investments filed an intent-to-use trademark application (Serial No. 86470477) for the mark THE KRUSTY KRAB for “restaurant services. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
The company asked U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
White and Norfolk and Southern Railway, 148 N.C. 541 (1908). [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
White and Norfolk and Southern Railway, 148 N.C. 541 (1908). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
” Citigroup, a leading financial services company, has offered a customer loyalty, reward, and redemption program using the term “THANKYOU” since 2004. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), Marsh pled guilty to criminal charges filed last September of one count of unauthorized access to a computer. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Field; and Joseph J. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:21 am
Dance in Video (Volume II) Dance in Video contains dance productions and documentaries by the most influential performers and companies of the 20th century. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
“We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 9:07 am
“Since late 2013, two Southern California plaintiffs lawyers have systematically targeted Google, Apple, Spotify, Lifelock, Blue Apron and other companies with subscription-based services under a 2010 California statute that prohibits automatic renewal charges without affirmative consent. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
Insurance companies and employers that subsidize insurance premiums care about the cost of care, while patients—who do not experience the true cost of care—focus ostensibly on quality. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
It is in fact the logical next step for the EU legislature to take in this field" and "a European copyright law would establish a truly unified legal framework, replacing the multitude of often opaque and sometimes conflicting national rules that presently exists. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
District Court for the Southern District of Georgia: U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:20 am
July 21, 2015), where the court noted “ERISA is a specialized field with a limited number of attorneys who specialize in representing plaintiffs seeking disability benefits, and . . . there is a national market for the services of those attorneys. . . . [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:20 am
July 21, 2015), where the court noted “ERISA is a specialized field with a limited number of attorneys who specialize in representing plaintiffs seeking disability benefits, and . . . there is a national market for the services of those attorneys. . . . [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:20 am
July 21, 2015), where the court noted “ERISA is a specialized field with a limited number of attorneys who specialize in representing plaintiffs seeking disability benefits, and . . . there is a national market for the services of those attorneys. . . . [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:34 am
| How cool is TMView | The "crowded field" in trade mark law | Genetic patents | US Court of Appeal for the 2nd Circuit and Google Books. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:32 pm
Most EU jurisdictions, as well as the OHIM, are not very sympathetic to the "crowded field" argument when assessing confusing similarity of trade marks. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
(2) Campbell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
