Search for: "First Bank v. Phillips" Results 101 - 120 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am by Benjamin Bissell
A day after rebel-held elections in eastern Ukraine, NATO’s top military commander, General Phillip M. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 2:26 pm by S
In The Co-Operative Bank Plc v Philips [2014] EWHC 2862 (Ch), Mr Philips was the owner of two residential premises both of which were the subject of mortgages in favour of Barclays Bank. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Catherine Rose
            The post Case Comment: Richardson & Anor v DPP [2014] UKSC 8 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm by Ronald Mann
The biggest problem with Alice’s case (presented by Carter Phillips) is its similarity to Bilski v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am by Ronald Mann
  But now the Supreme Court will have a chance to face the question squarely, in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
After an astonishing gap of exactly eight months there was a dissent in the Court – two to be precise – by Lords Mance and Clarke in Willaims v The Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:18 am by Catherine Rose
The post Case Preview: Richardson & Anor v DPP appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
The proper title is "Patent Box and ATL credits: The First Six Months - A Success?" [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Gary Klausner concluded, based on the relevant interrelatedness language, that a variety of lawsuits that first arose during the bank’s 2008-2009 policy period were deemed first made during the policy period of the bank’s prior insurance program, and by operation of two other policy provisions were excluded from coverage under the 2008-2009 program. [read post]