Search for: "First Morris Bank, Appeal of" Results 101 - 120 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am by John Mikhail
First, no such power was expressly given by the Articles of Confederation. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:55 am by Kevin LaCroix
  With respect to the SEC’s proposed rule, the agency now has to decide whether to appeal the D.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm by Peter B. Ladig
Ladig (pladig@morrisjames.com) is a partner at Morris James in Wilmington and a member of its corporate and fiduciary litigation group. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
Honda: CAFC’s first post-Therasense inequitable conduct opinion (Patently-O)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Hyatt – Supreme Court takes two more patent cases – Kappos v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Peter Rost
"These are legitimate concerns," concedes Lewis Morris, chief counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ unusually powerful Inspector General’s office, which is a key player in the search for ways to combat recidivism among pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Peter Rost
"These are legitimate concerns," concedes Lewis Morris, chief counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ unusually powerful Inspector General’s office, which is a key player in the search for ways to combat recidivism among pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
He also gave up a career in investment banking at JP Morgan in his mid-30s to become a biotechnology researcher at Oxford University. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am by Peter Rost
"These are legitimate concerns," concedes Lewis Morris, chief counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ unusually powerful Inspector General’s office, which is a key player in the search for ways to combat recidivism among pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and predicted that the… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:11 pm by Michael Sirkin
First, directors are tasked with a monitoring function. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Philip Morris USA (09-978); Altria Group v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The law supposedly exists to restore the claimant’s reputation, not to enhance their bank statement with hefty awards for damages. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
 brought the first major criminal case stemming from the financial  ...... [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
By David Evans Nov. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Prosecutor Michael Loucks remembers clearly when lawyers for Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drug company, looked across the table and promised it wouldn't break the law again. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Counsel for Philip Morris had argued that the city law violates the company's First Amendment right to advertise its product. [read post]